Loading...

Tampa Alimony Attorney Gary Dolgin Explains That Income That Could Be Earned On A Party’s Liquid Assets Should Be Imputed

Florida courts will typically impute income any time they feel that the financial picture one or both parties represent is not accurate. The court may impute income either on its own or it can impute income at the request of one party.

In Florida, it is well-settled that the court should impute income that could reasonably be earned on a former spouse’s liquid assets.

When a party receives an asset in equitable distribution that will result in immediate investment income, that income should not be excluded for purposes of determining alimony.

Moreover, when a spouse with underearning investments has the ability to generate additional earnings, without risk or loss or depletion of principal, but fails to do so, it is fair for the court to impute a more reasonable rate of return to the underearning assets, comparable to a prudent use of investment capital.

Here at The Law Offices of Gary S. Dolgin, we will put our knowledge and 30 years of experience to work for you, whether you are seeking alimony or defending a claim against alimony.

Being Board Certified in Marital and Family Law as well as being a Supreme Court Certified Family Law Mediator sets Gary Dolgin apart. He will put his expertise to work for you and advocate for the best possible result in your alimony case.

To schedule an alimony consultation with Board Certified Expert in Marital and Family Law in Tampa, Gary S. Dolgin, please call (813) 999-2772, and it will be our pleasure to help you.

Learn more about alimony by visiting:
Tampa Alimony Attorney – Gary S. Dolgin